site stats

Hangartner v city of seattle

WebACLU v. City of Seattle: 2009 Brouillet v. Cowles Publishing: 1990 City of Federal Way v. Koenig: 2009 Cowles Publishing Co. v. Murphy: 1981 Hangartner v. City of Seattle: 2004 Harold Carey v. Mason County: 2009 Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe: 1978 Laborers Int'l Union Local No. 374 v. City of Aberdeen: 1982 Nast v. Michels: 1986

Steven L. Canha, Appellant V State Of Wa Department Of …

WebACLU v. City of Seattle: 2009 Brouillet v. Cowles Publishing: 1990 City of Federal Way v. Koenig: 2009 Cowles Publishing Co. v. Murphy: 1981 Hangartner v. City of Seattle: 2004 Harold Carey v. Mason County: 2009 Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe: 1978 Laborers Int'l Union Local No. 374 v. City of Aberdeen: 1982 Nast v. Michels: 1986 O'Neill v. City of ... WebOct 31, 2016 · The Washington Supreme Court in Hangartner v. City of Seattle (2004) ruled that RCW 5.60.060(2), the statute codifying the common law attorney-client privilege, is an “other statute” discharge under RCW 42.56.070(1). Accordingly, records or portions of records covered by the attorney-client privilege are exempt under the PRI. hairdressers front st chester le street https://ventunesimopiano.com

Nissen v. Pierce Cnty., 183 Wash. 2d 863 Casetext Search + Citator

WebJun 9, 2009 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 452, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) (quoting Kammerer v. W. Gear Corp., 96 Wn.2d 416, 421, 635 P.2d 708 (1981)); RCW … WebCity of Seattle, 151 Wash. 2d 439 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash. 2d 439 – CourtListener.com WebOct 21, 2003 · The City agreed to allow Hangartner to amend his original complaint to include the City's refusal to release the AIA documents. The trial court then amended … hairdressers forestside

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) …

Category:Hangartner v. City of Seattle, No. 73930-7. - Washington - Case …

Tags:Hangartner v city of seattle

Hangartner v city of seattle

Hangartner v. City of Seattle, No. 73930-7. - Washington - Case …

WebMay 13, 2004 · HANGARTNER v. CITY OF SEATTLE (2004) Reset A A Font size: Print Supreme Court of Washington,En Banc. Rick HANGARTNER Respondent, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Appellant. Citizens Against the Monorail, a political … WebJustia › US Law › Case Law › Washington Case Law › Washington Court of Appeals, Division I Decisions › 2016 › Steven L. Canha, Appellant V State Of Wa Department Of Corrections, Respondent

Hangartner v city of seattle

Did you know?

WebThe Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case Rick Hangartner v. City of Seattle. This case examines the interplay between the Public Disclosure Act and the attorney … WebOct 26, 2009 · Mechling appeals the trial court's decision that personal e-mail addresses of the council members in e-mails discussing city business are exempt from disclosure under the personal information exemption of the Public Disclosure Act (PDA), former RCW 42.17.310 (1) (u) (2005). 1 Mechling also contends the trial court erred in ruling that the …

WebAug 11, 2005 · Shelley Marie Hall, Stokes Lawrence, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae (Allied Daily Newspapers of Washington, Inc.) ¶ 1 This case arises under the public disclosure act (PDA), chapter 42.17 RCW. WebRCW 42.56. 080; see also Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 447 -48, 90 P.3d 26 ( 2004). A party seeking public records under the PRA must, "at a minimum, provide notice that the request is made pursuant to the [ PRA] and identify the documents with reasonable clarity to allow the agency to locate them." Hangartner, 151 Wn.2d at 447.

WebMay 20, 2004 · Washington’s Public Disclosure Act was amended in 1987 to restrict the exemptions of the Act. According to Aaron Hugh Caplan, an American Civil Liberties … WebJun 9, 2009 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 452, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) (quoting Kammerer v. W. Gear Corp., 96 Wn.2d 416, 421, 635 P.2d 708 (1981)); RCW 5.60.060 (2) (a). This privilege "does not protect documents that are prepared for some other purpose than communicating with an attorney." Hangartner, 151 Wn.2d at 452.

WebHangartner v. City of Seattle was a case before the Washington State Supreme Court in 2004 concerning the volume of a public records request. See also Washington Public …

http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/166wn2d/166wn2d0747.htm hairdressers goonellabah nswWebMar 13, 2005 · The feud erupted last spring, when a sharply divided state Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that city of Seattle officials could use attorney-client privilege to withhold … hairdressers frankston areaWebHangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 447-48, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). "[A] party seeking documents must, at a minimum [ ( 1 ) ] provide notice that the request is made … hairdressers gainsborough lincolnshire